Life SciencesLiability
IndemnityNegotiable

Mutual Indemnity

What this clause says

Each Party shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other Party from and against any third-party claims arising out of the indemnifying Party's gross negligence or willful misconduct.

What this means in plain English

Each side covers the other if their own bad behavior causes a third-party lawsuit.

What it means for a CDMO program

This is the favorable structure - push for it. Pure mutual indemnity with a "gross negligence or willful misconduct" trigger is much narrower than a one-way indemnity for "any claim arising out of Manufacturer's services."

How this evaluates

The Decoder applies these rules in order; the first match wins.

  • indemnity › structure equals mutual → Compliant: Mutual indemnity is the favorable structure.
  • indemnity › structure is one of one-way-manufacturer, unknown → Borderline: Confirm indemnity is mutual or push to make it so.

See this in your MSA

Map this clause against your sponsor MSA.

Run the Decoder

Related clauses

Common questions about this clause

Questions about indemnity

Mutual Indemnity - common questions

Is mutual indemnity actually mutual?

In pharma/device MSAs, rarely. The "mutual" wording usually has carve-outs that favor the sponsor - IP, regulatory, brand reputation. Read the carve-outs carefully.

What insurance backs the indemnity obligation?

CGL primarily, with products as the heavy lifter for manufacturing claims. Some indemnity language reaches further than insurance covers - that is the gap to negotiate.

Can I cap my indemnity at insurance limits?

Sometimes - depends on negotiation leverage. Sophisticated CDMOs negotiate a cap at policy limits with carve-outs for gross negligence and willful misconduct.